Amar ek bandhu amake esnip ete ekta gan sonar janye bolechilo. Ganta sunlam (link halo gie
"http://www.esnips.com/doc/76eb0a65-f94e-42f1-a6d9-8ef9e70b2c48/Nanor-Itikotha")
Tabe ganta sonar por amar khub iccha halo nijer moner kathata ektu fans kare di, bahudin dhare chepe rakha kathata jiggesh kari.
Sunlam, lokta bhalo abritti kare. But still now I can't make out what went wrong in Singur. Is it political drama or farmer's plea towards justice , or media hype. I mean it would have been great if Tata would have completed the project in Singur, and it's not like TATA is like British empire who will invade and make ourselves slaves. country's one of the biggest company can't do big fraud in front of the whole country .I even don't understand Mamata's plea about farmers
1. Tata required and acquired more land than they have told earlier. But if a company of that status is making a commitment is it not not normal that there can be +/- 5% standard error.and a big plant also need accessory things , like rail road , dumping place electrical and water units etc. it's not only the manufacturing area , that counts .Probably a learned neta like mamata forgot all these things.
and does any F****** idiot had any idea before Tata came that how much farming used to happen in those villages and how many percentage of state income it used to earn? even no body knew about Singur or Nandigram earlier outside West Bengal.
2. Tata said that it will provide job to all the farmers whose land has been aquired but did not.
Can anyone tell me if it would have been an IIt franchisee instead of Tata would IIT have allowed all the farmers as professors and clerks,I don't think so.
So at last who won ?
Tata went ahead and made that company in Gujrat , they did not have any problem or rather we should say that they did not have fertile land at all , huh.. that's funny.
Ei etogulo shilpo bandho haye jabar por what West Bengal has to bask for ? at least Tata could have been a breather.
And the main question is , are those farmers happy now, having there Zameen(half unfertile land)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Kaku likhechen
ReplyDeleteTata Bihar (Including Jharkhand)-a more than 100 years aache. R natural resources Indiate sobcheye beshi Bihar-a. Sei natural resources er onektai Tatara tule niyeche. Bihar ki peyeche tar bodole. One of the poorest state in India. R WBer natural resource bolte ekmatro fertile land. Seita free of cost niye(REPEAT absolutely free of cost niye) Tata aro 100 years pore ki dito ---seta budhiman
bangalir bicharjo bishoy. 10000 singur familyr jomi kere niye 5000 er chakri dito.Corus / LandRover ro ekta foreign co.te prochur foreign reserve nosto koreche Ratan ---- sei sob jaygay Mamata chilona. Ei Tata sei Tata noy --- pitripurusher orjito sompotti niye gamble korai er kaj. Mamatar sob ogun thakleo, ekmatro purush politician WBe Mamata. R Tata Nanor 3/4 te varianter 80/90 p.c. exporter jonno. Bakituku eklakhi.
Nah, etotai jothesto.
Indra Likheche
ReplyDeleteMy personal view is that there is always a flip side of the coin. Such
projects will always have pro's and con's attached to it, but the
point which needs to be nailed in mind is the loss/gain that the
people of WB/Singur would have with/without this project.
Lets get this clear that Businessmen in todays world will put in their
money to reap benefits for themselves more than anyone else. The
difference in this scenario is the handling of the situation by the
Govt. Of West Bengal vis-a-vis that of Govt. of Gujrat.
1. Being in power for more than three decades there should have been a
demarkated land map for industrial and agricultural use (which Modi
had and WB Govt. lacked)
2. If the Govt. provides option for choosing a land (singur as against
Purulia or any other), TATA/anyone will choose the one with best
connectivity and other amenities apart from land quality.
3. Weather Govt. should be involved in taking up the land under its
control and transfer the same to TATA? In most of the other instances
its the company (should have been TATA in this case) that gets in
touch with the landloosers to negotiate on the price and compensation
packages. Its worth mentioning that RELIANCE is negotiating with the
landowners in MAharashtra for SEZ (finding it difficult though).
What MAMATA did was to exploit the conditions to the fullest in her
favour (as it seems after the LS elections).
But it seems whatever be the case the biggest looser have been the
COMMON MAN once again. Neither did the plant come up nor do the land
remain in their possession for agriculture (since the same has been
converted into an industrial land)
The below mentioned link is a good read... Pls do check it out...
http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/dec/09tata.htm